Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268475›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

Inflammation proteomics datasets in the ALSPAC cohort.

Neil Goulding, Lucy J Goudswaard, David A Hughes, Laura J Corbin, Alix Groom, Susan Ring, Nicholas J Timpson, Abigail Fraser, Kate Northstone, Matthew Suderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neil GouldingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2488-4598
Lucy J GoudswaardPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David A HughesPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-8998
Laura J CorbinPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alix GroomPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Susan RingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-9330
Nicholas J TimpsonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-9189
Abigail FraserPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-9470
Kate NorthstonePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-1983
Matthew SudermanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics is the identification, detection and quantification of proteins within a biological sample. The complete set of proteins expressed by an organism is known as the proteome. The availability of new high-throughput proteomic technologies, such as Olink Proteomic Proximity Extension Assay (PEA) technology has enabled detailed investigation of the circulating proteome in large-scale epidemiological studies. In particular, the Olink® Target 96 inflammatory panel allows the measurement of 92 circulating inflammatory proteins. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a prospective population-based cohort study which recruited pregnant women in 1991-1992 and has followed these women, their partners, and their offspring ever since. In this data note, we describe the newly-released proteomic data available in ALSPAC. Ninety-two proteins were analysed in 9000 blood plasma samples using the Olink® Target 96 inflammatory panel. Samples were derived from 2968 fasted mothers (mean age 47.5; Focus on Mothers 1 (FOM1)), 3005 non-fasted offspring at age 9 (Focus@9) and 3027 fasted offspring at age 24 (Focus@24). Post sample filtering, 1834 offspring have data at both timepoints and 1119 of those have data from their mother available. We performed quality control analyses using a standardised data processing workflow (

Indexed as

ALSPACbirth cohortinflammationinter-generationalOlinkProteomics

Identifiers

PMID39268475
PMCPMC11391261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.