Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268363›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Long-gap esophageal atresia: is native esophagus preservation always possible?

G M Treccarichi, V Di Benedetto, G Loria, M G Scuderi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G M TreccarichiPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G. F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy.
V Di BenedettoPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G. F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy.
G LoriaPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G. F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy.
M G ScuderiPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G. F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, AOU Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital defect that causes esophageal discontinuity, often with an associated tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) in 70%-90% of cases. When the distance between esophageal ends precludes primary anastomosis, it results in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), complicating the surgical management. This study retrospectively reviewed LGEA cases from the past decade, treated with the goal of preserving the native esophagus, comparing surgical techniques and outcomes with current literature. Materials and methods: The data of patients treated for LGEA between 2013 and 2024 were collected from medical charts, focusing on patients treated with the preservation of their native esophagus. Results: Ten patients were enrolled for this study. All of them had a gap between the esophageal ends equal to or greater than three vertebral bodies. Four patients (40%) underwent a delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) procedure, while the remaining six (60%) underwent a traction staged repair. All patients were treated with open surgery. The follow-up period extended from 3 months to 10 years. Conclusion: Preserving the native esophagus in patients with LGEA is a challenging but feasible goal, with delayed primary anastomosis and traction techniques playing key roles. We advocate for the preservation of the native esophagus as the preferred approach for ensuring a high quality of life for patients, as it helps to avoid severe long-term complications associated with esophageal substitution.

Indexed as

anastomotic strictureesophageal atresiaesophageal repairesophageal replacementesophageal salvagegastroesophageal refluxlong gap esophageal atresia

Identifiers

PMID39268363
PMCPMC11390569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.