Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268330›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2024

Appendectomy: Cross-sectional study of the effects of COVID-19 in a hospital in South Brazil.

Tierre Aguiar Gonçales, Thiago Lucas Bastos de Melo Moszkowicz, Mariana Severo Debastiani, Marcos Souza Parreira, Julia Kasali Lima, Rafael José Vargas Alves, Claudia Giuliano Bica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tierre Aguiar GonçalesGraduate Program in Pathology at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Thiago Lucas Bastos de Melo MoszkowiczGraduate Program in Pathology at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Mariana Severo DebastianiUndergraduate Medicine Program at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Marcos Souza ParreiraUndergraduate Medicine Program at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Julia Kasali LimaUndergraduate Medicine Program at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Rafael José Vargas AlvesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Health of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Claudia Giuliano BicaGraduate Program in Pathology at the Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil. Materials and methods: In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate. Results: The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisAppendectomyCOVID-19Emergency surgerySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39268330
PMCPMC11388162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.