ArticleCureus2024
Cleaning and Durability of Upper Extremity Orthotics: A Patient's Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Orthoses vs Conventional Immobilization Methods for Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.Journal of orthopedics for physician assistantsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to evaluate orthotic hygiene, preference for immobilization material, and frequency of unplanned orthotic adjustments and replacements. Methods All patients with fiberglass casts, thermoplastic splints, or prefabricated braces who presented at a large private academic institution between January 2020 and July 2023 were provided an 11-item survey assessing the length of immobilization, frequency of orthotic changes, orthotic hygiene, preference of immobilization, and whether patients recall instructions regarding orthotic care. Results A total of 385 surveys were collected, consisting of 96 (24.9%) casts, 202 (52.5%) thermoplastic splints, and 87 (22.6%) prefabricated braces. Patients were most frequently immobilized for two to six weeks. Of those, 106 (27.5%) patients required an unplanned adjustment or replacement. Almost half (182 patients, 47.3%) attempted to clean their orthotics, which was significantly greater among thermoplastic splints. A total of 229 (59.5%) respondents reported either not receiving or were unsure if they received instruction on proper orthotic hygiene. Conclusion Orthotic care and hygiene instructions are often overlooked or not retained by patients. Nearly one-third of patients required an unplanned adjustment or replacement, which was most frequent with thermoplastic orthotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.