ArticleCureus2024
Factors Affecting Compliance and Visual Outcomes in Patients Receiving Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a powerful mitogen for endothelial cells that promotes migration, proliferation, and tube formation necessary for the angiogenic development of new blood vessels. When VEGF increases significantly, it causes pathological angiogenesis and increased vascular permeability in eye conditions such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). These disorders have become important global sources of morbidity and have a substantial financial impact not only on the medical community but also on the patients. Therefore, this study aims to determine the success rates of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy and the visual outcomes which may be increased by determining the factors affecting patient compliance and raising awareness about DR, neovascular AMD, and RVO among patients and studying the factors responsible for non-compliance to treatment. Methodology This experimental pre-post study was conducted in the ophthalmology department at a tertiary care hospital and research center in western Maharashtra from September 2022 to June 2024. A total of 150 eyes of 150 patients who were diagnosed cases of DR, neovascular AMD, and non-ischemic RVO were included in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and statistical analysis was done using SPSS 27.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The chi-square test was employed to check the association between categorical variables. Pearson's correlation test was used, and p-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results The compliance rate in our study was 79.3% (113 individuals). In our study, 58% (87 individuals) were male while 42% (63 individuals) were females. Most patients were from urban areas 74.7% (112 individuals). Among the study participants, DR patients constituted 48.6% (73 individuals), while neovascular AMD and RVO were seen in 32% (48 individuals) and 19.4% (29 individuals), with 62% (93 individuals) being diabetic and 64.7% (97 individuals) being hypertensive. In our study, 92% (138 individuals) were willing to take treatment, with 88.7% (133 individuals) worried about their visual outcomes and 66% (99 individuals) afraid of getting injected. Appointments posed a financial burden to 30.7% (46 individuals) of patients, with 55.3% (83 individuals) having transportation issues. Overall, 18.7% (28 individuals) of patients had missed appointments between 14 and 90 days while 30.7% (46 individuals) had missed their appointments by 90 and 365 days. Younger patients with a shorter duration of diabetes had higher compliance rates. Post-injection, there was an overall significant improvement in vision as well as a reduction in the central subfield macular thickness, volume cube, and thickness average cube. Conclusions In the present study, four-fifths of the patients were compliant with treatment, and visual improvement was significant. In addition, there was a significant reduction in the macular thickness after the treatment. One of the factors for non-compliance included in our study was the need for follow-up. Younger patients and those with a shorter duration of diabetes had significantly higher compliance. We recommend further studies should be conducted to compare the effectiveness with the control group in randomized control trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.