ArticleCureus2024
Anticoagulant Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Longitudinal Study From Zanjan, Iran.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The mortality and morbidity of thrombotic events in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are increasing worldwide. The clinical impact of prophylactic anticoagulation regimens among these patients in Iran remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the use of prophylactic anticoagulants and outcomes among COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital. Methodology Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized between March 20 and June 20, 2020, were included in this longitudinal study after obtaining informed consent. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the hospital information system and medical records. Outcomes during this period were also evaluated. The data were entered into the preparation checklist and analyzed using SPSS version 24 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Of the 831 enrolled patients, 51.9% were female, and 10.6% needed to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The mean age of the patients was 57.16 ± 17.32 years, and the mortality rate was estimated to be 9.4%. Mortality rates were significantly higher at older ages, in men, patients with ICU admission, severe pulmonary involvement, malignancy, airway obstruction, ischemic heart disease, and previous cerebrovascular accidents. ICU admission and mortality were statistically significantly higher in those who received concurrent prophylactic anticoagulants and aspirin than in other individuals. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that administering prophylactic aspirin with or without anticoagulant agents in COVID-19 patients did not reduce mortality rates or ICU transfers. However, it is worth noting that anticoagulant prescription was associated with a decrease in ICU admissions, which could potentially alleviate the significantly higher mortality rates observed among ICU patients in this study. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of anticoagulants in COVID-19 treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.