ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2024
A comparison of basal and activity-dependent exon splicing in cortical-patterned neurons of human and mouse origin.
Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alpha-neurexins in health and disease.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodent studies have shown that alternative splicing in neurons plays important roles in development and maturity, and is regulatable by signals such as electrical activity. However, rodent-human similarities are less well explored. We compared basal and activity-dependent exon splicing in cortical-patterned human ESC-derived neurons with that in cortical mouse ESC-derived neurons, primary mouse cortical neurons at two developmental stages, and mouse hippocampal neurons, focussing on conserved orthologous exons. Both basal exon inclusion levels and activity-dependent changes in splicing showed human-mouse correlation. Conserved activity regulated exons are enriched in RBFOX, SAM68, NOVA and PTBP targets, and centered on cytoskeletal organization, mRNA processing, and synaptic signaling genes. However, human-mouse correlations were weaker than inter-mouse comparisons of neurons from different brain regions, developmental stages and origin (ESC vs. primary), suggestive of some inter-species divergence. The set of genes where activity-dependent splicing was observed only in human neurons were dominated by those involved in lipid biosynthesis, signaling and trafficking. Study of human exon splicing in mouse Tc1 neurons carrying human chromosome-21 showed that neuronal basal exon inclusion was influenced by cis-acting sequences, although may not be sufficient to confer activity-responsiveness in an allospecific environment. Overall, these comparisons suggest that neuronal alternative splicing should be confirmed in a human-relevant system even when exon structure is evolutionarily conserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.