ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Effect of paternal age on clinical outcomes of
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Microfluidics and Density Gradient Centrifugation for Sperm Preparation in IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Trial
- Clinical Implications of Paternal Age in Assisted Reproduction: Integrating Sperm Epigenetic Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of advanced paternal age on reproductive outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing cycles of young female: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of paternal age > 40 years on clinical pregnancy and perinatal outcomes among patients undergoing Methods: We selected 75 male patients (aged > 40 years) based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:3 ratio, resulting in a control group (aged ≤ 40 years) of 225 individuals. Various statistical tests, including the Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression, were used to analyze the association between paternal age and clinical outcomes. Results: We found no statistically significant differences in semen routine parameters, clinical pregnancy outcomes, and perinatal outcomes between paternal aged > 40 and ≤ 40 years. However, in the subgroup analysis, the live birth rate significantly decreased in those aged ≥ 45 compared to those aged 41-42 and 43-44 years (31.25% vs. 69.23% and 65%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Additionally, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower among those aged ≥ 45 than among those aged 41-42 (43.75% vs. 74.36%; p=0.035). Conclusion: Paternal age ≥ 45 years was associated with lower live birth and clinical pregnancy rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.