Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

A response time model of the three-choice Mnemonic Similarity Task provides stable, mechanistically interpretable individual-difference measures.

Nidhi V Banavar, Sharon M Noh, Christopher N Wahlheim, Brittany S Cassidy, C Brock Kirwan, Craig E L Stark, Aaron M Bornstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A compressed code for memory discrimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nidhi V BanavarDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Sharon M NohDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Christopher N WahlheimDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, CA, United States.
Brittany S CassidyDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, CA, United States.
C Brock KirwanDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Craig E L StarkDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Aaron M BornsteinDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, IrvineP30AG066519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Elizabeth Head · 2020 to 2026
$27.9M
Development of the mnemonic similarity task as a tool to address age and dementia-related memory declineR01AG066683 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI STARK, CRAIG E · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) is a widely used measure of individual tendency to discern small differences between remembered and presently presented stimuli. Significant work has established this measure as a reliable index of neurological and cognitive dysfunction and decline. However, questions remain about the neural and psychological mechanisms that support performance in the task. Methods: Here, we provide new insights into these questions by fitting seven previously-collected MST datasets (total Results: We show that these decomposed processes both contribute to the standard measure of behavior in this task, as well as capturing individual variation in this measure across the lifespan. We also exploit a delayed test/re-test manipulation in one of the experiments to show that model parameters exhibit improved stability, relative to the standard metric, across a 1 week delay. Finally, we apply the model to a resting-state fMRI dataset, finding that only the deliberative component corresponds to off-task co-activation in networks associated with long-term, episodic memory. Discussion: Taken together, these findings establish a novel mechanistic decomposition of MST behavior and help to constrain theories about the cognitive processes that support performance in the task.

Indexed as

fMRILinear Ballistic Accumulator modelmemorypattern separationresponse times

Identifiers

PMID39268219
PMCPMC11390373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.