Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Quantifying network behavior in the rat prefrontal cortex.

Congzhou M Sha, Jian Wang, Richard B Mailman, Yang Yang, Nikolay V Dokholyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Congzhou M ShaDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Jian WangDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Richard B MailmanDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Yang YangDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Nikolay V DokholyanDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Funding

Nanoscale programming of cellular and physiological phenotypes: EquipmentR35GM134864 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Nikolay Dokholyan · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
AI-based Mapping of Complex Cannabis Extracts in Pain PathwaysR01AT012053 · NCCIH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Nikolay Dokholyan, KENT E VRANA · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Discovery of functionally selective dopamine ligands for age-related cognitive declineRF1AG071675 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY, MAILMAN, RICHARD B · 2021 to 2021
$1.5M
Discovery of functionally selective dopamine ligands for age-related cognitive declineR01AG071675 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY, MAILMAN, RICHARD B · 2024 to 2025
$968k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT012053NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071675NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG071675NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question of how consciousness and behavior arise from neural activity is fundamental to understanding the brain, and to improving the diagnosis and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. There is significant murine and primate literature on how behavior is related to the electrophysiological activity of the medial prefrontal cortex and its role in working memory processes such as planning and decision-making. Existing experimental designs, specifically the rodent spike train and local field potential recordings during the T-maze alternation task, have insufficient statistical power to unravel the complex processes of the prefrontal cortex. We therefore examined the theoretical limitations of such experiments, providing concrete guidelines for robust and reproducible science. To approach these theoretical limits, we applied dynamic time warping and associated statistical tests to data from neuron spike trains and local field potentials. The goal was to quantify neural network synchronicity and the correlation of neuroelectrophysiology with rat behavior. The results show the statistical limitations of existing data, and the fact that making meaningful comparison between dynamic time warping with traditional Fourier and wavelet analysis is impossible until larger and cleaner datasets are available.

Indexed as

decision-makingdynamic time warpingneuron synchronizationneurophysiologynon-parametric testrat prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID39268151
PMCPMC11390430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.