Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268145›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Machine learning models from computed tomography to diagnose thymic epithelial tumors requiring combined resection.

Yuki Onozato, Hidemi Suzuki, Hiroki Matsumoto, Takamasa Ito, Takayoshi Yamamoto, Kazuhisa Tanaka, Yuichi Sakairi, Yukiko Matsui, Takekazu Iwata, Tomohiko Iida and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuki OnozatoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6298-707X
Hidemi SuzukiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroki MatsumotoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Sakurai, Kisarazu-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Takamasa ItoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Takayoshi YamamotoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Centre, Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Kazuhisa TanakaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Yuichi SakairiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Yukiko MatsuiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Takekazu IwataDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Centre, Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Tomohiko IidaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Sakurai, Kisarazu-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Toshihiko IizasaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Centre, Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Ichiro YoshinoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive approaches have been a standard choice of surgery for noninvasive thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), but we sometimes experience cases requiring combined resection of adjacent structures. We develop and validate machine learning models to predict combined resection based on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods: This study included 212 patients with TETs (140 in the training cohort and 72 in the validation cohort) who underwent radical surgery. Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT and predicted with five feature selection methods and seven machine learning models in nested cross validation. The clinical utility of the models was analyzed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Fifty-five patients in the training cohort and 28 in the validation cohort required combined resection. The classifiers random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) indicated high predictive performance, with the XGB classifier based on features selected by GB performing the best, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.797. In the validation cohort, the classifier had an AUC of 0.817. The DCA showed the validity of the model with a threshold range of 15-72%. When restricted to combined pulmonary and pericardial resection, the respective AUCs were 0.736 and 0.674 for the training cohort and 0.806 and 0.924 for the validation cohort. Conclusions: The machine learning model based on preoperative CT images was able to diagnose TETs requiring combined resection with high accuracy. The DCA demonstrated a wide range of model validity and may aid in surgical approach selection.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)machine learningradiomicssurgical procedureThymic epithelial tumor (TET)

Identifiers

PMID39268145
PMCPMC11388251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.