Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268140›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Effects of the teach-back method on the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Pan Zhang, Yanan Zhu, Yixuan Wang, Wenhui Zhang, Cheng Qiao, Heqing Lou, Yanan Liu, Dongmei Dong, Xuan Zhu, Bi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pan ZhangDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Yanan ZhuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yixuan WangDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Wenhui ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Cheng QiaoDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Heqing LouDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Yanan LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Dongmei DongDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Xuan ZhuDepartment of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China.
Bi ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-6433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The teach-back method (TBM), also known as the "show-me" method, is a technique for verifying patients' understanding of health-related information that has been recommended for improving health literacy. However, the research on TBM effect on the outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of a TBM intervention on the health status of COPD patients. Methods: This real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,688 patients with COPD from 18 communities in China. Participants received either TBM plus usual care (UC) or UC only. General practitioners were trained in TBM before the intervention. The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and dyspnea, as measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale. Data on acute exacerbations and deaths were extracted from medical records. Lung function was expressed as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of the predicted value [FEV Results: In total, 336 of the 853 COPD patients in the intervention group (TBM plus UC) had comorbid depression, compared with 329 of the 835 in the control group (UC only). The TBM group showed a significantly greater improvement in HADS depression and anxiety subscale scores (HADS-D and HADS-A, respectively) than the UC group at12 months (t =8.34, P<0.001; t=12.18, P<0.001). The CAT and mMRC scores were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (t=8.43, P<0.001; t=7.23, P<0.001). The numbers of acute exacerbations and deaths were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (mean MCF values were 0.35 and 0.56, respectively [difference of 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41, -0.02; χ Conclusions: General practitioners can use TBM interventions to effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and dyspnea symptoms, decrease the frequency of exacerbations and likelihood of death, and improve health-related quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD. Trial Registration: The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (reference: ChiCTR-TRC-12001958).

Indexed as

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)health statusteach-back method (TBM)

Identifiers

PMID39268140
PMCPMC11388232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.