Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268139›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

20 years clinical application of the vacuum bell for conservative treatment of pectus excavatum-past, present, future.

Frank-Martin Haecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosis and Management of Pectus Excavatum in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frank-Martin HaeckerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For decades, open surgical repair was the only available method to treat pectus excavatum (PE). In 1998 Donald Nuss described first time a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), and today MIRPE is performed with increasing frequency worldwide. However, despite its minimally invasive approach, with the widespread use of MIRPE the character and number of complications have increased. 20 years ago, non-surgical measures such as vacuum bell therapy (VBT) were introduced as a useful complement for specific treatment of PE patients. However, until today there are no existing validated guidelines concerning VBT. Methods: The study includes the results of an online survey submitted to the members of Chest Wall International Group (CWIG), a selective review of the English spoken current literature with focus on VBT and an analysis of our own previous studies concerning VBT. Results: Seventy-two percent of the CWIG members practicing in 47 different institutions confirmed to use VBT for PE patients. Furthermore, within the last 10 to 15 years an increasing number of studies were identified reporting on successful use of VBT for PE. However, a recently published study stated that the effect of VBT is predominantly because of thickening of the chest wall by increasing pre-sternal adipose tissue. There was one study comparing VBT to MIRPE but no randomized and/or prospective studies comparing conservative treatment Conclusions: Non-operative treatment of PE with VBT proved to be safe and a potential alternative to surgical repair in carefully selected PE patients. Patient's age at diagnosis and severity of the PE represents relevant variables to decide which kind of therapy might be successful to correct PE. Especially in PE patients under the age of 10 years, VBT seems to represent the first step of specific therapy.

Indexed as

conservative treatmentoutcomePectus excavatum (PE)vacuum bell therapy (VBT)

Identifiers

PMID39268139
PMCPMC11388214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.