ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Effectiveness of multi-disciplinary team management on 5-year overall survival for patients with stage III lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Team Care for Early-Stage Lung Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Emerging Economies: Current Position and Call for Action.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- Availability of multidisciplinary treatment modalities and outcomes among patients with resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stage III lung cancer (LC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases, and the optimal management is still a matter of debate. To date, only a few studies have assessed the role of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion in impacting survival of stage III LC. Hence, we aimed to reported the impact of the implementation of MDT discussion on long-term survival of stage III LC patients. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, single-centre cohort study evaluating data of consecutive patients with a clinical and pathological diagnosis of stage III LC treated before [2005-2011] and after [2012-2020] the implementation of MDT. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 983 patients were enrolled with stage III LC, 411 (41.8%) pre-MDT and 572 (58.2%) post-MDT. The 5-year OS rates were 25.3% for the pre-MDT cohort and 33.9% for the post-MDT cohort (P=0.0008). Resected patients (n=670), who underwent trimodality therapy achieved a higher 5-year OS in both pre-MDT and post-MDT groups. An increased 5-year OS was observed in patients who underwent systemic therapy, from 28.2% in pre-MDT to 40.2% in post-MDT cohorts. In non-resected patients, there was an increased in 5-year OS in both systemic and chemoradiotherapy groups. Conclusions: The implementation of an MDT increased the 5-year OS in both resected and non-resected stage III LC patients. Implementing MDT might be useful in improving the management of therapy with less invasive local and surgical strategies personalized for each LC patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.