ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Microbiological confirmation of tuberculous pleurisy with medical thoracoscopy: targeted pleural washing and pleural biopsy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for accurate diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Nanopore Sequencing for Tuberculous Serous Effusions.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the pauci-bacillary nature of tuberculous (TB) pleurisy, clinical diagnosis is common, but microbiological confirmation is necessary to determine drug resistance. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of medical thoracoscopy (MT) for microbiological confirmation of TB pleurisy. Methods: Medical records of patients diagnosed as TB pleurisy with microbiological or histologic evidence who underwent MT between May 2015 and July 2023 at Incheon St. Mary's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sensitivities of microbiological results [acid-fast bacilli (AFB) culture or TB-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] of pre-MT pleural fluid and those of targeted pleural washing fluid and pleural tissues obtained during MT were compared. Difference in sensitivity was verified with McNemar's test. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled. With pre-MT pleural fluid, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB PCR were 5.6% (4/72) and 1.4% (1/72), respectively. With targeted pleural washing fluid, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB-PCR were 23.6% (17/72) and 12.5% (9/72), respectively. With pleural tissues, sensitivities of AFB culture and TB-PCR were 18.1% (13/72) and 40.3% (29/72), respectively. MT showed an additional 27.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 14.2-40.1%, P<0.001] of sensitivity gain in AFB culture and 40.3% (95% CI: 25.7-52.5%, P<0.001) of sensitivity gain in TB-PCR. With pleural washing, additional 19.4% (95% CI: 6.8-31.6%, P=0.001) of sensitivity gain in microbiological confirmation was identified, whereas additional 37.5% (95% CI: 22.6-50.2%, P<0.001) of sensitivity gain was identified with pleural biopsy. Conclusions: With MT, 44.4% of additional sensitivity gain in microbiological confirmation of TB pleurisy was identified. This underscores the role of MT in the diagnosis of TB pleurisy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.