ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Exploring the impact of variable power outputs on the efficacy and safety during microwave ablation for lung carcinoma: a real-world study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Percutaneous and Endovascular Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Outcomes following microwave ablation of 669 primary and metastatic lung malignancies.European radiology · 2026Article
- Analysis of perioperative risk factors and development of predictive models for complications following CT guided microwave ablation of pulmonary nodules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important method for the treatment of lung cancer, but there is still a lack of standard guidelines for the selection of power. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of MWA at different power levels. Methods: The study gathered individuals underwent MWA for lung cancer between January 2012 and December 2020. All patients were divided into low power group and high power group based on the power of MWA. By intergroup comparisons, we clarified the differences between the two groups. Results: In this study, 265 participants were involved, with 192 in the low power group and 73 in the high power group. Compared to the low power group, the high power group had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications (63.0% Conclusions: While high-power MWA brings better long-term prognosis to patients, it also leads to an increase in postoperative complications. The application of a nomogram for stratifying the prognosis of patients may be a more feasible approach to further develop individualized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.