ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Contribution of fluorescence imaging to thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy: a multicenter propensity matching analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of indocyanine green in thoracic surgery: a literature review.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Fluorescence in Determining the Intersegmental Plane During Intentional Pulmonary Segmentectomy: Results of a Prospective Study on 196 Patients.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy is increasingly recognized for managing early-stage lung cancer. However accurately identifying intersegmental planes (ISPs), especially in complex lung segments, remains challenging. In comparison to conventional methods, fluorescence imaging represents a novel solution. This study aimed to examine the potential benefits of fluorescence imaging in single-port thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. Methods: A multicenter (three regional hospitals), retrospective, comparative analysis was conducted using data from 402 consecutive patients who underwent single-port thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy from June 2020 to December 2022. The cohort included 191 patients treated with the fluorescence method and 211 patients treated with the modified inflation-deflation method. Among the cohort, 130 patients were placed in the simple segmentectomy group and 272 in the complex segmentectomy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the fluorescence and modified inflation-deflation subgroups in the complex segmentectomy group. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: In the simple segmentectomy group, no significant differences were observed between the fluorescence and modified inflation-deflation methods regarding segmental resection time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative chest tube drainage and duration, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, complication rate, or hospital costs. In the complex segmentectomy group, however, fluorescence imaging significantly shortened segmental resection time (69.37±28.22 Conclusions: Fluorescence-guided single-port thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy demonstrated comparable perioperative safety and effectiveness to the modified inflation-deflation technique while offering advantages, such as shorter segmental resection time, for complex segmentectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.