Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268090›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy: a narrative review of systems.

Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy, Nikitha C Chandra, Anoop Koratala, Alejandra Yu Lee-Mateus, Alanna Barrios-Ruiz, Ana Garza-Salas, Tapendra Koirala, Rodrigo Funes-Ferrada, Prasanth Balasubramanian, Neal M Patel and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. VirtualJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sebastian Fernandez-BussyDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3847-4127
Nikitha C ChandraDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-2417
Anoop KoratalaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-2237
Alejandra Yu Lee-MateusDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-6761
Alanna Barrios-RuizDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8332-8682
Ana Garza-SalasDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-4345
Tapendra KoiralaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-3566
Rodrigo Funes-FerradaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3361-5107
Prasanth BalasubramanianDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-1583
Neal M PatelDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ryan ChadhaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Britney N HazelettDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7929-1389
Kelly S RobertsonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Janani ReisenauerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-6691
David Abia-TrujilloDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-292X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has emerged as an advanced technology for lung cancer diagnosis. This review explores the three approved robotic bronchoscopy systems: Ion™ Endoluminal (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), Monarch™ (Johnson & Johnson, Redwood City, CA, USA), and Galaxy System™ (Noah Medical, San Carlos, CA, USA), and their different operational systems. This narrative review aims to summarize their findings and outcomes for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) suspected of lung cancer. Methods: A search in PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted for articles and abstracts published between January 2018 to May 2024 using the terms "robotic bronchoscopy" or "robotic-assisted bronchoscopy" for biopsy of PPL. Key Content and Findings: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The introduction of RAB aims to improve the feasibility and safety of sampling PPL. Current literature describes high diagnostic yields with low risk of complications, allowing concurrent hilar and mediastinal staging within the same procedure. RAB can potentially improve early diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary malignancies and survival rate in long term, while progressing towards therapeutic applications in the near future. Conclusions: As RAB evolves, its potential as a "one-stop shop" for diagnosis, staging, and treatment can positively impact lung cancer detection, focusing on improved patient-centered outcomes and reducing multiple diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Indexed as

electromagnetic navigation (EMN)lung cancerRobotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB)shape-sensing technology

Identifiers

PMID39268090
PMCPMC11388208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.