Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267992›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

Changing the paradigm for primary research dissemination.

Ashley Farley, Kazuhiro Hayashi, Eva Hnatkova, Hans de Jonge, Heather Joseph, Robert Kiley, Ruth King, Rebecca Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashley FarleyBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kazuhiro HayashiNational Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Tokyo, Japan.
Eva HnatkovaNational Library of Technology (NTK), University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3237-9305
Hans de JongeDutch Research Council, NWO, The Haque, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-9133
Heather JosephSPARC, Washington DC, USA.
Robert KileycOAlition S, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-2558
Ruth KingOpen Research Central, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9914-6344
Rebecca LawrenceF1000 Research Ltd, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4817-8206

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predominant research publishing system is not equitable by design, nor optimised to advance research to create knowledge and ultimately to benefit society. Open Research Central (ORC) was created to foster the re-imagination of the research dissemination system to facilitate trust, transparency and equitable participation. In five years of operation, before dissolving, the non-profit organisation produced outputs and learnings valuable to the development of a responsible research dissemination system. We are sharing our experience in the hope that it will provide others who share the same vision and goals with useful materials to build on. We think that there remains a need for global, cross-stakeholder exploration to build collective understanding of research validation and dissemination and to pilot solutions. However, as this article will explore, enabling and supporting the development of such a collective voice and consequent action is a challenging endeavour in the current landscape and funding environment.

Indexed as

cross-stakeholderfunding.Open researchresearch disseminationresearch validationscholarly infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID39267992
PMCPMC11391192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.