Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267971›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

Molecular mechanisms of Sepsis attacking the immune system and solid organs.

Zhaoyun Yang, Yan Gao, Lijing Zhao, Xuejiao Lv, Yanwei Du

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proteomic profiling and pathway analyses reveal molecular signatures and immune networks in pediatric sepsis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaoyun Yang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yan Gao *State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Biomedical Sciences, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Lijing ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xuejiao LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yanwei DuDepartment of Rehabilitation, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been achieved in sepsis treatment in recent times, the mortality rate of sepsis has experienced a gradual decline as a result of the prompt administration of antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and the implementation of various therapies aimed at supporting multiple organ functions. However, there is still significant mortality and room for improvement. The mortality rate for septic patients, 22.5%, is still unacceptably high, accounting for 19.7% of all global deaths. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly comprehend the pathogenesis of sepsis in order to enhance clinical diagnosis and treatment methods. Here, we summarized classic mechanisms of sepsis progression, activation of signal pathways, mitochondrial quality control, imbalance of pro-and anti- inflammation response, diseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), cell death, presented the latest research findings for each mechanism and identify potential therapeutic targets within each mechanism.

Indexed as

apoptosisinflammationmechanismpathogenesispyroptosissepsis

Identifiers

PMID39267971
PMCPMC11390691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.