ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Rare giant retroperitoneal melanotic schwannoma: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retroperitoneal schwannoma: A rare entity with diagnostic challenges.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Cervical Malignant Melanotic Nerve Sheath Tumor with retained PRKAR1A expression and a clinically benign course: a case report and review of the literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Melanotic schwannoma (MS), a rare variant of peripheral nerve sheath tumor, is especially infrequent when originating from the peritoneum. Its definitive diagnosis relies on postoperative histopathological examination and immunohistochemical analysis, while preoperative diagnosis is difficult. Case presentation: In the present study, we reported a rare case of giant MS in the retroperitoneum, which was previously misdiagnosed before surgery. However, intraoperative exploration revealed it was retroperitoneal tumor. The tumor had invaded the abdominal aorta and bilateral common illiac artery walls. A surgical resection was subsequently executed, and postoperative histopathological examination confirmed it as a MS. Conclusion: The incidence of peritoneal MS is extremely rare, and surgical resection remains the preferred treatment modality. Given the absence of established guidelines for postoperative adjuvant therapy, long-term follow-up becomes imperative to accumulate valuable clinical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.