Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267824›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Weakly supervised large-scale pancreatic cancer detection using multi-instance learning.

Shyamapada Mandal, Keerthiveena Balraj, Hariprasad Kodamana, Chetan Arora, Julie M Clark, David S Kwon, Anurag S Rathore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shyamapada MandalDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Keerthiveena BalrajYardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Hariprasad KodamanaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Chetan AroraYardi School of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Julie M ClarkHenry Ford Pancreatic Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
David S KwonHenry Ford Pancreatic Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States.
Anurag S RathoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Early detection of pancreatic cancer continues to be a challenge due to the difficulty in accurately identifying specific signs or symptoms that might correlate with the onset of pancreatic cancer. Unlike breast or colon or prostate cancer where screening tests are often useful in identifying cancerous development, there are no tests to diagnose pancreatic cancers. As a result, most pancreatic cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage, where treatment options, whether systemic therapy, radiation, or surgical interventions, offer limited efficacy. Methods: A two-stage weakly supervised deep learning-based model has been proposed to identify pancreatic tumors using computed tomography (CT) images from Henry Ford Health (HFH) and publicly available Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) data sets. In the first stage, the nnU-Net supervised segmentation model was used to crop an area in the location of the pancreas, which was trained on the MSKCC repository of 281 patient image sets with established pancreatic tumors. In the second stage, a multi-instance learning-based weakly supervised classification model was applied on the cropped pancreas region to segregate pancreatic tumors from normal appearing pancreas. The model was trained, tested, and validated on images obtained from an HFH repository with 463 cases and 2,882 controls. Results: The proposed deep learning model, the two-stage architecture, offers an accuracy of 0.907 Discussion: The proposed two-stage deep learning architecture shows significantly enhanced performance for predicting the presence of a tumor in the pancreas using CT images compared with other reported studies in the literature.

Indexed as

feature extractionimage segmentationmedical image analysismulti-instance learningpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID39267824
PMCPMC11390448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.