Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267640›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.

Marta Del Olmo Rodríguez, Rafael Martos Martinez, Adriana Pascual Martínez, Carolina Miranda Castillo, Jorge Short Apellaniz, Bernadette Pfang, Enrique Baca-García, Raúl Córdoba Mascuñano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marta Del Olmo RodríguezHospital Management, Quirónsalud 4H Network, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Martos MartinezDepartment of Hematology, General Villalba University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Adriana Pascual MartínezInfanta Elena University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carolina Miranda CastilloDepartment of Hematology, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Short ApellanizHospital Management, Quirónsalud 4H Network, Madrid, Spain.
Bernadette PfangClinical and Organizational Innovation Unit (UICO), Quirónsalud 4H Network, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Baca-GarcíaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Raúl Córdoba MascuñanoFundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The spreading adoption of value-based models of healthcare delivery has incentivized the use of patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in clinical practice, with the potential to enrich the decision-making process with patient-reported data. Methods: This perspective article explores PROs and the shared decision-making (SDM) process as components of value-based healthcare. We describe the potential of PROMs and PREMs within the decision-making process and present a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process using aggregated data from a healthcare system PROMs and PREMs program, including early results from implementation in hospital network in Madrid, Spain. Results: The proposed digital framework incorporates aggregated data from a hospital network PROMs and PREMs program as part of a digital patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with lymphoma. After the first hematologist appointment, participating patients access the PDA to review relevant information about clinical and patient-reported outcomes for each of the possible options, assign a personal order of priority to different outcomes, and then select their preferred course of action. Patients' answers are automatically uploaded to the EHR and discussed with hematologists at the next appointment. After beginning treatment, patients are invited to participate in the network PROMs program; participants' PROMs data are fed back into the PDA, thus "closing the circle" between the decision-making process and patient-reported data collection.During the first 14 months after launching the decision aid in October 2022, of 25 patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma at the four participating hospitals, 13 patients decided to participate. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between groups. Average SDM Q-9 score for patients filling in the questionnaire ( Conclusion: Various obstacles toward widespread implementation of SDM exist such as time constraints, lack of motivation, and resistance to change. Support and active engagement from policy makers and healthcare managers is key to overcome hurdles for capturing patient-reported data and carrying out shared decision-making at healthcare system level. Early results of a digital framework for PRO-enriched SDM seem to be beneficial to the decision-making process.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpaindigital patient decision aidpatient-reported outcomesPREMsPROMSshared decision-makingvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39267640
PMCPMC11390557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.