ReviewPediatric pulmonology2024
The new biologic drugs: Which children with asthma should get what?
Review in Pediatric pulmonology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Switching of Biological Drugs in Paediatric Severe Asthma: Experience of a Referral Centre.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Review
- Biologics in Pediatric Asthma: Controlling Symptoms, Maintaining Safety, and Improving Outcomes.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Age-specific efficacy of biologics in severe asthma: a pediatric perspective.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Prognostic utility of pre-biologic treatment correlates of childhood severe asthma exacerbation risk: Real world evidence.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Article
- Monoclonal Antibody Treatment for Pediatric Asthma: Current Evidence and Findings From a Delaware Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Histopathological and Molecular Insights into Chronic Nasopharyngeal and Otic Disorders in Children: Structural and Immune Mechanisms Underlying Disease Chronicity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Complexities of Pediatric Asthma Treatment: Evidence, Controversies, and Emerging Approaches.Paediatric drugs · 2025Review
- Efficacy of omalizumab after discontinuation: a retrospective single-center observational study in children with severe asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- The new biologic drugs: Which children with asthma should get what?Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Review
- Evaluating Severe Therapy-Resistant Asthma in Children: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novel biologics (targeted antibody therapies) have revolutionized the management of severe childhood asthma. However, it is important that the right biologic is selected for the right patient, and understanding the evidence base for each biologic is crucial. Currently, four biologics (all monoclonal antibodies) are licensed in the UK for the treatment of children with severe asthma - omalizumab (Xolair), mepolizumab (Nucala), and dupilumab (Dupixent) in children aged 6 years and over; and tezepelumab (Tezspire), only in children aged 12 years and over. Tezepelumab is the only licensed biological that may be beneficial in severe asthma without evidence of Type 2 inflammation. All have a good safety profile but varying degrees of clinical efficacy in children, with wide variation in treatment responsiveness between individual patients. When selecting biologics for severe asthma, it is essential to remember the limitations of the current pediatric evidence. At present, there are no results from randomized, head-to-head trials of biologics in severe asthma. TREAT is an ongoing trial comparing omalizumab to mepolizumab and will be one of the first to provide such evidence. We must be especially aware of the dangers of extrapolating data from adults to children, because the pathophysiology and role of biomarkers may differ significantly from adult asthma. Given the current level of knowledge, even after treatment has been initiated, children should be regularly reviewed to determine the efficacy of treatment, side-effect profile and consideration of when treatment with the biologic should be discontinued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.