ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment
A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through meticulous examination of lymph nodes, the stage and severity of cancer can be determined. This information is invaluable for doctors to select the most appropriate treatment plan and predict patient prognosis; however, any oversight in the examination of lymph nodes may lead to cancer metastasis and poor prognosis. In this review, we summarize a significant number of articles supported by statistical data and clinical experience, proposing a standardized evaluation protocol for lymph nodes. This protocol begins with preoperative imaging to assess the presence of lymph node metastasis. Radiomics has replaced the single-modality approach, and deep learning models have been constructed to assist in image analysis with superior performance to that of the human eye. The focus of this review lies in intraoperative lymphadenectomy. Multiple international authorities have recommended specific numbers for lymphadenectomy in various cancers, providing surgeons with clear guidelines. These numbers are calculated by applying various statistical methods and real-world data. In the third chapter, we mention the growing concern about immune impairment caused by lymph node dissection, as the lack of CD8 memory T cells may have a negative impact on postoperative immunotherapy. Both excessive and less lymph node dissection have led to conflicting findings on postoperative immunotherapy. In conclusion, we propose a protocol that can be referenced by surgeons. With the systematic management of lymph nodes, we can control tumor progression with the greatest possible likelihood, optimize the preoperative examination process, reduce intraoperative risks, and improve postoperative quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.