Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267318›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthodontics2024

Prevalence and nature of bullying in schoolchildren aged 10-14 years and its association with malocclusion: A cross-sectional study in the South East of the UK.

Andrew DiBiase, Zaffie Cox, Michaela Rea, Lazaros Gonidis, Lindsey Cameron, Adam Rutland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Medical Necessity of Orthodontic Care: A Qualitative Study.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew DiBiaseMaxillofacial Department, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-5674-0630
Zaffie CoxSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Michaela ReaDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.
Lazaros GonidisSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Lindsey CameronSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Adam RutlandPsychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the prevalence of, and relationship between, bullying and malocclusion in schoolchildren aged 10-14 years in the South East of the UK.

designCross-sectional cohort study.

settingSixteen primary and secondary schools in South East of the UK.

participantsSchoolchildren aged 10-14 years who were consented to participate.

methodsThe prevalence and nature of bullying were measured using a questionnaire. Traits of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment were assessed by clinical examination and determined by the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) Dental Health (DHC) and Aesthetic components (AC).

resultsComplete data were collected for 698 participants. The number defined as being bullied was 68 (9.7%). There was no difference in the prevalence of bullying between gender, ethnicity or age. Higher rates of bullying were reported in mixed sex schools (

conclusionA significant relationship was evident between being bullied and certain traits of malocclusion.

Indexed as

BullyingMalocclusionAdolescentChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEsthetics, DentalFemaleHumansIndex of Orthodontic Treatment NeedMaleOverbitePrevalenceSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombullyingfrequencymalocclusionschoolchildren

Identifiers

PMID39267318
PMCPMC11408966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.