ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Novel methods to construct a representative sample for surveying California's unhoused population: the California Statewide Study of People Experiencing Homelessness.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Personal Networks of People Experiencing Homelessness in King County, WA with Aggregate Relational Data.Social networks · 2026Article
- Article
- Health Care Access and Use Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing literature on people experiencing homelessness (PEH) draws on nonrepresentative samples from service providers, populations with comorbidities, or areas with disproportionately high amounts of sheltered homelessness, leading to bias. Nearly one-third of PEH in the United States and more than half of unsheltered PEH live in California. We designed a rigorous state-representative survey of PEH to investigate the antecedents of homelessness, understand health, and inform policy solutions. The multistage design randomized at 3 levels: county, venue, and individual. Stratifying the state into 8 regions, we sampled 1 county per region to reflect statewide demographics. Within counties, sampled venues matched the expected proportion of sheltered and unsheltered residents. Within venues, interviewers randomly sampled individuals. We adjusted for nonresponse and incorporated poststratification to benchmarks. In parallel, respondent-driven sampling reached subpopulations through social networks who may otherwise have been undersampled. Our community-engaged study yielded 3200 quantitative surveys. We purposively sampled 365 participants for qualitative interviews. Demographic estimates match those found in the PIT with the added strength of statistical inference. To our knowledge, this is the first large representative study of PEH, beyond a single county, to draw inference on a large population that did not depend on service utilization. Our methods may inform future efforts to understand homelessness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.