ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2024
Perceptions of lifestyle-related risk communication in patients with breast and colorectal cancer: a qualitative interview study in Sweden.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial aspects of early detection in type 1 diabetes: Language matters, decision making and support needs.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Review
- Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk and prevention: insights into knowledge gaps and lifestyle attitudes.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Mind the gaps and educational disparities in awareness of cancer risk factors: a cross-sectional study amongst the general public in Sweden.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer risk: stereotypical assumptions and competing values - a qualitative study with the general public.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Role of PARP Inhibitors: A New Hope for Breast Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInforming individuals about their risk of cancer can sometimes have negative consequences, such as inflicting unnecessary worry and fostering stigma. This study aims to explore how patients diagnosed with breast or colorectal cancer perceive and experience risk communication, particularly concerning the increased focus on lifestyle behaviors as the cause of cancer.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted during autumn 2023, with 23 Swedish individuals, aged 34 to 79 years, diagnosed with breast or colorectal cancer. The collected data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis described by Braun & Clark. The study adopted an experiential orientation grounded in critical realism.
resultsFive themes with ten sub-themes were identified: Thoughts and feelings about the causes of cancer, Moralizing messages and negative encounters, The need to take action, Balancing uncertain risks and a fulfilling life, and Societal benefits of risk communication. The participants expressed that knowledge of the the cause of cancer is closely related to the possibility of taking preventive action against relapses. Ability to take action was also perceived important for their well-being. Therefore, risk information entails both feelings of self-blame and hope for the future. Participants asked for both information and lifestyle support from healthcare professionals. Lifestyle interventions and patient support groups were solicited and perceived as an important aspect of cancer survivals' well-being, and may help to reduce the cancer-related stigma.
conclusionIndividuals that have or have had breast or colorectal cancer, including those leading healthy lifestyles, found moralistic risk information offensive, leading to feelings of shame when thinking about other peoples thoughts. Balancing information involves providing transparent, evidence-based information while considering individual and social contexts, avoiding stigmatization and blame, and supplementing information with support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.