Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267134›Full record

ReviewBioelectronic medicine2024

Vagal nerve stimulation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: from bench to bedside.

Giuseppe Giannino, Lorenzo Nocera, Maria Andolfatto, Valentina Braia, Federico Giacobbe, Francesco Bruno, Andrea Saglietto, Filippo Angelini, Ovidio De Filippo, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giuseppe GianninoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Lorenzo NoceraCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Maria AndolfattoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Valentina BraiaCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Federico GiacobbeCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Francesco BrunoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Andrea SagliettoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Filippo AngeliniCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Ovidio De FilippoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Fabrizio D'AscenzoCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Gaetano Maria De FerrariCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Veronica DusiCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy. veronica.dusi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-3126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of acute cardioprotective strategies against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury that can be applied in the catheterization room is currently an unmet clinical need and several interventions evaluated in the past at the pre-clinical level have failed in translation. Autonomic imbalance, sustained by an abnormal afferent signalling, is a key component of I/R injury. Accordingly, there is a strong rationale for neuromodulation strategies, aimed at reducing sympathetic activity and/or increasing vagal tone, in this setting. In this review we focus on cervical vagal nerve stimulation (cVNS) and on transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS); the latest has the potential to overcome several of the issues of invasive cVNS, including the possibility of being used in an acute setting, while retaining its beneficial effects. First, we discuss the pathophysiology of I/R injury, that is mostly a consequence of the overproduction of reactive oxygen species. Second, we describe the functional anatomy of the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system and the most relevant principles of bioelectronic medicine applied to electrical vagal modulation, with a particular focus on taVNS. Then, we provide a detailed and comprehensive summary of the most relevant pre-clinical studies of invasive and non-invasive VNS that support its strong cardioprotective effect whenever there is an acute or chronic cardiac injury and specifically in the setting of myocardial I/R injury. The potential benefit in the emerging field of post cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is also mentioned. Indeed, electrical cVNS has a strong anti-adrenergic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidants, anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic effect; most of the involved molecular pathways were already directly confirmed to take place at the cardiac level for taVNS. Pre-clinical data clearly show that the sooner VNS is applied, the better the outcome, with the possibility of a marked infarct size reduction and almost complete left ventricular reverse remodelling when VNS is applied immediately before and during reperfusion. Finally, we describe in detail the limited but very promising clinical experience of taVNS in I/R injury available so far.

Indexed as

Autonomic imbalanceBioelectronic medicineCholinergic anti-inflammatory pathwayIschemia/reperfusion injuryTragusTranscutaneous vagal nerve stimulationVagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID39267134
PMCPMC11395864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.