Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Efficacy and safety of MR-guided adaptive simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized controlled phase III trial.
Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06246344 (Efficacy and Safety of Adaptive Boost Radiotherapy to Primary Lesions and Positive Nodes in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Adaptive Boost Radiotherapy to Primary Lesions and Positive Nodes in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence Gap in Managing Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review of Radiation Boost Strategies.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Determining optimal GTV-to-PGTV margins for CT-guided dose-escalated radiotherapy with daily image guidance in locally advanced rectal cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- A Review on the Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Chinese herbal medicines: the modifier of hepatocellular carcinoma targeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), optimizing neoadjuvant strategies, including the addition of concurrent chemotherapy and dose escalation of radiotherapy, is essential to improve tumor regression and subsequent implementation of anal preservation strategies. Currently, dose escalation studies in rectal cancer have focused on the primary lesions. However, a common source of recurrence in LARC is the metastasis of cancer cells to the proximal lymph nodes. In our trial, we implement simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes in the experimental group based on magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART), which allows for more precise (and consequently intense) targeting while sparing neighboring healthy tissue. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRgART dose escalation to both primary lesions and positive lymph nodes, in comparison with the conventional radiotherapy of long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) group, in the neoadjuvant treatment of LARC.
methodsThis is a multi-center, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT06246344). 128 patients with LARC (cT3-4/N+) will be enrolled. During LCCRT, patients will be randomized to receive either MRgART with SIB (60-65 Gy in 25-28 fractions to primary lesions and positive lymph nodes; 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions to the pelvis) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions). Both groups will receive concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine and consolidation chemotherapy of either two cycles of CAPEOX or three cycles of FOLFOX between radiotherapy and surgery. The primary endpoints are pathological complete response (pCR) rate and surgical difficulty, while the secondary endpoints are clinical complete response (cCR) rate, 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, acute and late toxicity and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Since dose escalation of both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC is rare, we propose conducting a phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SIB for both primary lesions and positive nodes in LARC based on MRgART.
trial registrationThe study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT06246344 (Registered 7th Feb 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.