Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267015›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Postoperative sensitivity of composites using novel Bacillus subtilis nanofortified adhesives: a triple-blind study.

Nehal Amir, Afsheen Mansoor, Nabiha Eeman, Muhammad Nouman Ahmed, Emaan Mansoor, Khadim Hussain, Paulo J Palma

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06242184 (Post-operative Sensitivity in Composites Using Bacillus Subtilis Procured Novel Nano-fortified Adhesive), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06242184 nacompletednot on this map

Post-operative Sensitivity in Composites Using Bacillus Subtilis Procured Novel Nano-fortified Adhesive: a Triple-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPakistan Institute of Medical SciencesRan2023 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsCaries,Dental, Sensitivity, ToothArmsGroup A(Nano-fortified Adhesive), Group B(Adhesive without nanoparticles)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nehal AmirDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Afsheen MansoorDepartment of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan. drafsheenqamar@gmail.com.
Nabiha EemanMedical Student, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Nouman AhmedMedical Student, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Emaan MansoorIslamic International Dental College, Riphah International University Islamabad, Islamabad, 46000, Pakistan.
Khadim HussainCRS Agriculture Department, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Paulo J PalmaFaculty of Medicine, Center for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3000-075, Portugal. ppalma@uc.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

nanotechnologyis the art and science of dealing with nanoscale particles. This has transformed contemporary dental practices through myriad contributions to biomaterial science. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles procured from Bacillus subtilis, an eco-friendly and biogenic source, can significantly magnify the physiochemical attributes of dental materials. However, postoperative sensitivity is a major drawback of composite restorations. The incorporation of these nanoparticles into dental adhesives can greatly benefit clinical dentistry by resolving this issue. This trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel titanium dioxide nanofortified adhesive on the postoperative sensitivity of composite restorations.

methodsThis triple-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamabad, from May 15, 2023, to November 25, 2023. Participants (n = 60) with Class I and II primary carious lesions with a minimum cavity depth of 3-5 mm were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 30). After obtaining informed consent, the restorative procedure was accomplished using a minimally invasive approach and etch-and-rinse adhesive strategy. In group A, a nanofortified adhesive was used for composite restoration, whereas in group B, an adhesive without nanoparticles was used. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at follow-up periods: of one day, one week, two weeks and one month. A Chi-square test was used to compare postoperative sensitivity between the two groups. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsA noteworthy association was observed between sensitivity and the group variable at all four evaluation periods: after one day (p = 0.002), 1 week (p = 0.002), 2 weeks (p = 0.007) and one month. In conclusion, participants who underwent restorative intervention using titanium dioxide nanoreinforced adhesives reported a notable reduction in sensitivity at all time intervals. Hence, the occurrence and severity of postoperative sensitivity are significantly reduced using Bacillus subtilis-procured nanofortified adhesives as compared to conventional adhesives without nanoparticles.

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT06242184) on 03/02/2024. All procedures involving human participants were performed in conformance with this protocol.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisComposite ResinsDental CementsTitaniumAdolescentAdultDental CariesDental Restoration, PermanentDentin SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleNanoparticlesYoung AdultComposite ResinsDental CementsTitaniumtitanium dioxideComposite resinsDentin sensitivityNanoparticlesRestorationTitanium dioxide

Identifiers

PMID39267015
PMCPMC11396156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.