ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Mild cognitive impairment prediction based on multi-stream convolutional neural networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facial phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease: from neurobiology to artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Review
- The Deep Learning Revolution in Neuroimaging: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024).Neuroinformatics · 2026Review
- From fingers to brain: virtual reality-based test capturing fine hand movements predicts cognitive function in older adults.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Optimization of deep learning architecture based on multi-path convolutional neural network algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the transition stage between the cognitive decline expected in normal aging and more severe cognitive decline such as dementia. The early diagnosis of MCI plays an important role in human healthcare. Current methods of MCI detection include cognitive tests to screen for executive function impairments, possibly followed by neuroimaging tests. However, these methods are expensive and time-consuming. Several studies have demonstrated that MCI and dementia can be detected by machine learning technologies from different modality data. This study proposes a multi-stream convolutional neural network (MCNN) model to predict MCI from face videos.
resultsThe total effective data are 48 facial videos from 45 participants, including 35 videos from normal cognitive participants and 13 videos from MCI participants. The videos are divided into several segments. Then, the MCNN captures the latent facial spatial features and facial dynamic features of each segment and classifies the segment as MCI or normal. Finally, the aggregation stage produces the final detection results of the input video. We evaluate 27 MCNN model combinations including three ResNet architectures, three optimizers, and three activation functions. The experimental results showed that the ResNet-50 backbone with Swish activation function and Ranger optimizer produces the best results with an F1-score of 89% at the segment level. However, the ResNet-18 backbone with Swish and Ranger achieves the F1-score of 100% at the participant level.
conclusionsThis study presents an efficient new method for predicting MCI from facial videos. Studies have shown that MCI can be detected from facial videos, and facial data can be used as a biomarker for MCI. This approach is very promising for developing accurate models for screening MCI through facial data. It demonstrates that automated, non-invasive, and inexpensive MCI screening methods are feasible and do not require highly subjective paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Evaluation of 27 model combinations also found that ResNet-50 with Swish is more stable for different optimizers. Such results provide directions for hyperparameter tuning to further improve MCI predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.