ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Automated Three-Dimensional Imaging and Pfirrmann Classification of Intervertebral Disc Using a Graphical Neural Network in Sagittal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- SpineScan: a deep learning model for lumbar spine MRI annotation and Pfirrmann grading assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.Cureus · 2025Review
- A CNN Autoencoder for Learning Latent Disc Geometry from Segmented Lumbar Spine MRI.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Segment Anything Model (SAM) and Medical SAM (MedSAM) for Lumbar Spine MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a graph neural network (GNN) for automated three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) visualization and Pfirrmann grading of intervertebral discs (IVDs), and benchmark it against manual classifications. Lumbar IVD MRI data from 300 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Two clinicians assessed the manual segmentation and grading for inter-rater reliability using Cohen's kappa. The IVDs were then processed and classified using an automated convolutional neural network (CNN)-GNN pipeline, and their performance was evaluated using F1 scores. Manual Pfirrmann grading exhibited moderate agreement (κ = 0.455-0.565) among the clinicians, with higher exact match frequencies at lower lumbar levels. Single-grade discrepancies were prevalent except at L5/S1. Automated segmentation of IVDs using a pretrained U-Net model achieved an F1 score of 0.85, with a precision and recall of 0.83 and 0.88, respectively. Following 3D reconstruction of the automatically segmented IVD into a 3D point-cloud representation of the target intervertebral disc, the GNN model demonstrated moderate performance in Pfirrmann classification. The highest precision (0.81) and F1 score (0.71) were observed at L2/3, whereas the overall metrics indicated moderate performance (precision: 0.46, recall: 0.47, and F1 score: 0.46), with variability across spinal levels. The integration of CNN and GNN offers a new perspective for automating IVD analysis in MRI. Although the current performance highlights the need for further refinement, the moderate accuracy of the model, combined with its 3D visualization capabilities, establishes a promising foundation for more advanced grading systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.