ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Deep Learning for Automated Classification of Hip Hardware on Radiographs.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Automatic Model for Circle Detection in X-Ray Imagery: A Case Study on Hip Prosthesis Wear.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning model for automated classification of orthopedic hardware on pelvic and hip radiographs, which can be clinically implemented to decrease radiologist workload and improve consistency among radiology reports. MATERIALS AND
methodsPelvic and hip radiographs from 4279 studies in 1073 patients were retrospectively obtained and reviewed by musculoskeletal radiologists. Two convolutional neural networks, EfficientNet-B4 and NFNet-F3, were trained to perform the image classification task into the following most represented categories: no hardware, total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty, intramedullary nail, femoral neck cannulated screws, dynamic hip screw, lateral blade/plate, THA with additional femoral fixation, and post-infectious hip. Model performance was assessed on an independent test set of 851 studies from 262 patients and compared to individual performance of five subspecialty-trained radiologists using leave-one-out analysis against an aggregate gold standard label.
resultsFor multiclass classification, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for NFNet-F3 was 0.99 or greater for all classes, and EfficientNet-B4 0.99 or greater for all classes except post-infectious hip, with an AUC of 0.97. When compared with human observers, models achieved an accuracy of 97%, which is non-inferior to four out of five radiologists and outperformed one radiologist. Cohen's kappa coefficient for both models ranged from 0.96 to 0.97, indicating excellent inter-reader agreement.
conclusionA deep learning model can be used to classify a range of orthopedic hip hardware with high accuracy and comparable performance to subspecialty-trained radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.