Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266911›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Convolutional Neural Networks for Segmentation of Pleural Mesothelioma: Analysis of Probability Map Thresholds (CALGB 30901, Alliance).

Mena Shenouda, Eyjólfur Gudmundsson, Feng Li, Christopher M Straus, Hedy L Kindler, Arkadiusz Z Dudek, Thomas Stinchcombe, Xiaofei Wang, Adam Starkey, Samuel G Armato Iii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Radiomics for differentiation of somaticJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mena ShenoudaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-1350
Eyjólfur GudmundssonIcelandic Radiation Safety Authority, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Feng LiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Christopher M StrausDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Hedy L KindlerDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Arkadiusz Z DudekMetro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN, 55416, USA.
Thomas StinchcombeDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durkham, NC, 27710, USA.
Xiaofei WangAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Adam StarkeyDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Samuel G Armato IiiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. s-armato@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium (MMCORC)UG1CA189863 · NCI · PARK NICOLLET INSTITUTE · PI JOLEEN M HUBBARD, Yan Ji · 2014 to 2026
$43.2M
Northwestern University Lead Academic Participating Site Supplement Year 2UG1CA233320 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSON, AL B, MATEI, DANIELA E · 2019 to 2025
$5.5M
The Duke University - Duke Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network LAPS (UG1) Support GrantUG1CA233253 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI John H Strickler, Alexandra Thomas · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189863NCI NIH HHS UG1CA189863NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233253NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233253NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233320NCI NIH HHS UG1CA233320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of probability map threshold on pleural mesothelioma (PM) tumor delineations generated using a convolutional neural network (CNN). One hundred eighty-six CT scans from 48 PM patients were segmented by a VGG16/U-Net CNN. A radiologist modified the contours generated at a 0.5 probability threshold. Percent difference of tumor volume and overlap using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were compared between the reference standard provided by the radiologist and CNN outputs for thresholds ranging from 0.001 to 0.9. CNN-derived contours consistently yielded smaller tumor volumes than radiologist contours. Reducing the probability threshold from 0.5 to 0.01 decreased the absolute percent volume difference, on average, from 42.93% to 26.60%. Median and mean DSC ranged from 0.57 to 0.59, with a peak at a threshold of 0.2; no distinct threshold was found for percent volume difference. The CNN exhibited deficiencies with specific disease presentations, such as severe pleural effusion or disease in the pleural fissure. No single output threshold in the CNN probability maps was optimal for both tumor volume and DSC. This study emphasized the importance of considering both figures of merit when evaluating deep learning-based tumor segmentations across probability thresholds. This work underscores the need to simultaneously assess tumor volume and spatial overlap when evaluating CNN performance. While automated segmentations may yield comparable tumor volumes to that of the reference standard, the spatial region delineated by the CNN at a specific threshold is equally important.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksMesotheliomaPleural NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerProbabilityRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID39266911
PMCPMC11950581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.