ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
A scoring-based clinical grading model for xanthelasma palpebrarum: predicting treatment frequency and prognosis.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed COAmerican journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Xanthelasma palpebrarum is one of the most common cutaneous xanthomas in humans. Currently, there are various methods available for treating xanthelasma palpebrarum, but the high treatment frequency and recurrence rate remain significant challenges for patients. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reasonable and effective clinical grading system to guide the diagnosis and treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum. We developed a clinical scoring system related to local injection of pingyangmycin for the treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum, which can be used to predict early prognosis and treatment outcomes in patients. We collected and retrospectively studied 246 outpatient cases of xanthelasma palpebrarum treated with local injection of pingyangmycin in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Shanghai East Hospital from February 2020 to August 2022. Potential independent risk factors for adverse outcomes (recurrence or non-recurrence) were considered in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Predictive factors were determined based on the multivariate logistic regression model and Cox model, and a scoring grading system was established. External validation was conducted on an independent cohort of 110 patients. Based on logistic regression analysis, the number, area, and color of lesions were identified as significant predictive indicators (P < 0.05), with respective AUCs of 0.710, 0.799, and 0.755. The Cox model established hazard ratios for four new severity indicators of xanthelasma palpebrarum: hyperlipidemia, number of lesions, lesion area, and lesion grayscale value. Based on these findings, a new clinical grading model was developed, which was validated to be effective in the external cohort. The new scoring-based clinical predictive model can effectively predict the number of pingyangmycin injection treatments and prognosis in patients with xanthelasma palpebrarum. It holds promise for broader application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39266881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.