ArticleDrug safety2025
Qualitative Interviews with Stakeholders in Herbal Pharmacovigilance and Recommendations for Best Practices to be Applied Worldwide.
Article in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Framework for identifying reference countries in drug safety evaluation: an application of the analytic hierarchy process.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Evidence-based production framework for herbal medicine regulation in Indonesia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Analysis of Adverse Reactions Associated with the Use ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe use of herbal products globally is substantial, but varying definitions and regulatory frameworks have led to differences in their status as medicinal products and in approaches to monitoring their safety. This article explores the current landscape of herbal pharmacovigilance, drawing insights from interviews with global experts in the field, and offers recommendations for best practices to enhance the safety and benefit-to-harm balance of herbal products.
methodsThis study comprised semi-structured interviews with members of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance-Herbal and Traditional Medicines Special Interest Group and the Nutrivigilance Information Exchange Network, recruited using purposive sampling. Data were stored and coded using NVIVO
resultsSixteen participants from 11 countries were interviewed, revealing diverse regulatory approaches and challenges in herbal pharmacovigilance. Key themes included legal status, awareness, identification and coding of herbal products, pre-/post-marketing product control, reporting of adverse drug reactions, causality assessment and signals of herbal products. This study yielded five general recommendations to further improve herbal pharmacovigilance worldwide.
conclusionsThis study offers an overview of the global landscape of herbal pharmacovigilance, highlighting challenges in monitoring herbal products and presenting universal recommendations. These recommendations encompass increasing awareness, enhancing education and improving legislative frameworks. Given the growing use of herbal products, the implementation of strong pharmacovigilance practices is crucial to ensure consumer safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39266812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.