Routine conventional leak test is not required for robotic major pulmonary resections.

objectiveWe retrospectively evaluated whether or not conventional air leak testing is necessary in robotic major pulmonary resections.

methodsAfter excluding patients who received 2 or more days of postoperative drainage for chylothorax or excessive pleural effusion, 578 patients who underwent major pulmonary resection using minimally invasive approaches between February 2019 and November 2023 at our institution were included in this study. All patients were divided into two groups including thoracoscopic (n = 471) and robotic (n = 107) approaches. Conventional air leak testing was performed in all patients in the thoracoscopic approach but not in the robotic approach. After propensity score matching of patient backgrounds between the two groups, perioperative outcomes were compared (n = 100 each). The primary endpoint was the rate of drain removal on postoperative day (POD) 2 or later. In addition, factors associated with drain removal on POD 2 or later in the robotic group were identified.

resultsThe rate of drain removal at POD 2 or later was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with drain removal at POD2 or later in the robotic approach showed that sealant application (p = 0.002) and lobectomy (vs. segmentectomy, p = 0.034) were significantly associated.

conclusionsIn conclusion, even in the absence of air leak testing, a robotic approach for major lung resections can result in a drain removal rate on the day of surgery or POD1 that is comparable to a conventional thoracoscopic approach. However, it may be useful in selected patients requiring sealant placement or undergoing lobectomy.