ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Deep brain stimulation and pallidotomy in primary Meige syndrome: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- White matter microstructural alterations correlate with clinical characteristics in craniocervical dystonia.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Beyond the Neck: Long-Term Motor and Non-motor Outcomes of Pallidal DBS in Craniocervical Dystonia.Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary Meige syndrome (PMS) is a rare form of dystonia, and comparative analysis of globus pallidus internal deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS), subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS), and pallidotomy has been lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and psychiatric features of GPi-DBS, STN-DBS, and pallidotomy in patients with PMS.
methodsThis prospective cohort study was divided into three groups: GPi-DBS, STN-DBS, and pallidotomy. Clinical assessments, including motor and non-motor domains, were evaluated at baseline and at 1 year and 3 years after neurostimulation/surgery.
resultsNinety-eight patients were recruited: 46 patients received GPi-DBS, 34 received STN-DBS, and 18 underwent pallidotomy. In the GPi-DBS group, the movement score of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) improved from a mean (SE) of 13.8 (1.0) before surgery to 5.0 (0.7) (95% CI, -10.5 to -7.1; P < 0.001) at 3 years. Similarly, in the STN-DBS group, the mean (SE) score improved from 13.2 (0.8) to 3.5 (0.5) (95% CI, -10.3 to -8.1; P < 0.001) at 3 years, and in the pallidotomy group, it improved from 14.9 (1.3) to 6.0 (1.1) (95% CI, -11.3 to -6.5; P < 0.001) at 3 years. They were comparable therapeutic approaches for PMS that can improve motor function and quality of life without non-motor side effects.
conclusionsDBS and pallidotomy are safe and effective treatments for PMS, and an in-depth exploration of non-motor symptoms may be a new entry point for gaining a comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39266808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.