Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266795›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence Combined with a Standard Tracer Versus ICG Alone for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: The INFLUENCE Trial.

Vassilis Pitsinis, Rahul Kanitkar, Alessio Vinci, Wen Ling Choong, John Benson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vassilis PitsinisDepartment of Breast Surgery, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK. vpitsinis@mac.com.
Rahul KanitkarDepartment of Breast Surgery, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Alessio VinciDepartment of Breast Surgery, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Wen Ling ChoongDepartment of Breast Surgery, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
John BensonBreast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor clinically node-negative early breast cancer patients, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dual localization with blue dye and radioisotope (RI) is currently standard of care. Documented disadvantages with these tracers have prompted exploration of alternative agents such as fluorescent indocyanine green (ICG), which demonstrates high detection rates combined with other tracers. Results of a randomized study evaluating ICG as a single tracer for SLN identification are presented.

methodsOverall, 100 patients with unilateral, clinically node-negative, biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer (≤5 cm) scheduled for SLNB were recruited in two separate randomized cohorts, with 50 patients receiving ICG alone. Cohort 1 received ICG alone (n = 25) or combined with RI [Technetium

resultsAmong evaluable patients (n = 97), the overall SLN identification rate was 96.9% (ICG alone = 97.9%; ICG + RI = 100%; ICG + blue dye = 92%). Node positivity rates were 14.9% for ICG alone, 16% for ICG combined with RI, and 20% for ICG combined with blue dye. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in performance parameters, with ICG alone being non-inferior to tracer combinations for procedural node positivity rates when adjusted for specific factors.

conclusionThese results support potential use of ICG as a sole tracer agent for routine SLNB, thereby avoiding disadvantages of RI and/or blue dye. The latter can be safely withheld as a co-tracer without compromising detection of positive nodes in primary surgical patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFluorescenceFluorescent DyesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessColoring AgentsFluorescent DyesIndocyanine GreenRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetiumTechnetium-99

Identifiers

PMID39266795
PMCPMC11549146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.