Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266793›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Perineal-First Approach in Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection.

Kenji Kawada, Yukio Inamura, Akitaka Morikawa, Hiroya Matsuoka, Mitsuru Yokota, Kazutaka Obama, Kazuyuki Kawamoto

Abstract readCase ReportsVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenji KawadaDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan. kkawada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Yukio InamuraDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Akitaka MorikawaDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroya MatsuokaDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Mitsuru YokotaDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kazutaka ObamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuyuki KawamotoDepartment of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough abdominoperineal resection (APR) is required for rectal cancer invading the levator ani muscle, its curative outcomes remain poorer than those of other rectal surgeries.

methodsFor a 46 year-old man, locally advanced rectal cancer invading the levator ani muscles was diagnosed. Although total neoadjuvant therapy (8 cycles of induction FOLFOXIRI followed by chemoradiotherapy 50.4 Gy) decreased the tumor size, invasion was suspected still to remain. Therefore, robotic APR was performed. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient. For the perineal-first approach, we created a circular incision around the anus, then divided the fat tissues of the ischiorectal fossa until the levator ani muscle was exposed on both sides. Posterior and anterior dissections were performed along the coccyx and external anal sphincter, respectively. After placement of a lap protector to maintain air-tightness, the robotic approach was initiated. Posterior dissection was performed along the coccyx, then was connected to the already-dissected space created earlier by the perineal approach. Next, the levator ani muscle was divided from the dorsal to the lateral side. Finally, anterior dissection was performed along the prostate, followed by division of the rectourethral muscle, the smooth muscle fibers running vertically. The creation of the already-dissected space on the perineal side offers advantages of robotic manipulation from the abdominal side, especially anterior dissection.

resultsWe performed robotic APR using the perineal-first approach for 17 consecutive patients (12 men and 5 women) between 2019 and 2023. All 17 patients achieved complete total mesorectal excision with negative margins. The mean time required for the perineal approach was about 25 min. In anterior dissection using the robotic approach, division of the smooth muscle fibers at the perineal body (i.e., rectourethral muscle in males

conclusionRobotic APR with a perineal-first approach can be advantageous in ensuring surgical margin safety (especially for the anterior aspect of the rectum).

Indexed as

PerineumProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39266793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.