ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Evaluation of forces applied to tissues during robotic-assisted surgical tasks using a novel force feedback technology.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Applications, Therapeutic Outcomes, and Implementation Strategies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Motor learning with force feedback instruments among laparoscopic surgeons and residents.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Prevention and management of pulmonary vascular complications in anatomic lung resections: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Force sensing and haptic feedback in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis of technological evolution and translational trajectories.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Robotic adhesiolysis: current evidence, technical considerations, and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Transoral Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: Communication-Related Outcomes and Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantitative analysis of da Vinci 5 force feedback technology in robotic rectal surgery: a preliminary pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Enhanced surgical efficiency with the next-generation da Vinci 5 system compared with da Vinci Xi: a retrospective cohort study in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Soft, Flexible, and Stretchable Platforms for Tissue-Interfaced Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Sensorized Vascular High-Fidelity Physical Simulator for Robot-Assisted Surgery Training: A Multisite Pilot Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of intraoperative force quantification during robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a prospective case series using integrated force-sensing technology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Emerging technologies in thoracic surgery: artificial intelligence, robotic-assisted surgery, and telesurgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of haptic feedback during local and remote robotic surgery: single-blind cadaveric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Force in robotic thoracic surgery -a one year analysis of DaVinci 5 force feedback.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Design and Performance of a Neurosurgery Assisting Device.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Toumai robotic system in partial nephrectomy and key system features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
- Safety of Continuous Force Feedback in Robotic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe absence of force feedback (FFB) is considered a technical limitation in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). This pre-clinical study aims to evaluate the forces applied to tissues using a novel integrated FFB technology, which allows surgeons to sense forces exerted at the instrument tips.
methodsTwenty-eight surgeons with varying experience levels employed FFB instruments to perform three robotic-assisted surgical tasks, including retraction, dissection, and suturing, on inanimate or ex-vivo models, while the instrument sensors recorded and conveyed the applied forces to the surgeon hand controllers of the robotic system. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models were used to analyze the mean and maximal forces applied during each task with the FFB sensor at the "Off" setting compared to the "High" sensitivity setting for retraction and to the "Low", "Medium", and "High" sensitivity settings for dissection and suturing. Sub-analysis was also performed on surgeon experience levels.
resultsThe use of FFB at any of the sensitivity settings resulted in a significant reduction in both the mean and maximal forces exerted on tissue during all three robotic-assisted surgical tasks (p < 0.0001). The maximal force exerted, potentially associated with tissue damage, was decreased by 36%, 41%, and 55% with the use of FFB at the "High" sensitivity setting while performing retraction, dissection, and interrupted suturing tasks, respectively. Further, the use of FFB resulted in substantial reductions in force variance during the performance of all three types of tasks. In general, reductions in mean and maximal forces were observed among surgeons at all experience levels. The degree of force reduction depends on the sensitivity setting selected and the types of surgical tasks evaluated.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the utilization of FFB technology integrated in the robotic surgical system significantly reduced the forces exerted on tissue during the performance of surgical tasks at all surgeon experience levels. The reduction in the force applied and a consistency of force application achieved with FFB use, could result in decreases in tissue trauma and blood loss, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RAS. Future studies will be important to determine the impact of FFB instruments in a live clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.