Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266729›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2025

Exerting force at the maximal speed drives the increase in power output in elite athletes after 4 weeks of resistance training.

Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edoardo LecceDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Ruggero RomagnoliDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Giorgio FrinolliDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Francesco FeliciDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Maria Francesca PiacentiniDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Ilenia BazzucchiDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy. ilenia.bazzucchi@uniroma4.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6017-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the present study, we examined how a 4-week intervention of maximal intended velocity (MIVRT) and controlled velocity resistance training (CRT)-induced task-specific responses in expert individuals.

methodsTwenty elite athletes were randomly assigned to either a MIVRT (n = 10) or CRT (n = 10) group, both following the same volume-load training based on the back-squat three times a week but with different intentions in moving load (force-exertion speed). We assessed one-repetition maximum (1RM), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean propulsive power (MPP) using a progressive-loading test before and after the intervention. A linear position transducer was used to monitor propulsive velocity in training and testing sessions.

resultsBoth groups significantly increased their 1RM (CRT: + 12.3%, p < 0.001, d = 0.39; MIVRT: + 12.5%, p < 0.001, d = 0.45). Only the MIVRT group showed a significant improvement in MPV (p < 0.01) across different stepping loads, while both groups improved in MPP (MIVRT: + 22.4%, p < 0.001, d = 0.54; CRT: + 8.1%, p = 0.04, d = 0.17).

conclusionsMIVRT induced significant adaptations in MPV and MPP at various loads (%1RM), underlining its specificity in targeting these parameters. Despite similar enhancements in 1RM, the distinct training protocols suggest that strength gains may stem from either maximal intent in moving loads or longer times under tension. This study highlights the role of execution speed in optimizing power outcomes, emphasizing task specificity as paramount to elicit physiological adaptations in chronically strength-trained individuals.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultAthletesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultExercise physiologyNeuromuscular adaptationsPowerResistance trainingStrengthVelocity-based training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.