ArticleJournal of human hypertension2024
How do the guideline recommendations work for you? Patients' perceived effectiveness of therapeutic approaches in arterial hypertension.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood pressure remains in the hypertensive range in nearly half of those affected by arterial hypertension despite it being an extremely modifiable risk factor, whereby morbidity decreases significantly upon implementation of lifestyle-based therapeutic approaches. There are significant discrepancies between the S3 guideline's recommendations and its implementation. In this cross-sectional study sampling 160 inpatients with arterial hypertension, we assessed patients' perceptions of secondary prevention therapeutic approaches recommended to them within treatment guidelines. Additionally, we used psychometric questionnaires to assess prevention factors. We conducted a latent class analysis to identify patterns in patients' views, and tested for group differences regarding gender, age, education years, body mass index, psychopathology, and blood pressure. Two latent classes could be identified: Class 1 tended to perceive all recommended therapeutic approaches as helpful and reflected individuals with high-normal blood pressure. Class 2 tended to view recommendations regarding weight reduction, and cessation of nicotine and alcohol use, as less effective and included those with mild hypertension. There were no statistically significant class differences regarding the socio-demographic parameters. We further examined the evaluation of therapeutic approaches independent of classes, with social support reported to be the most effective approach. In conclusion, persistently-elevated blood pressure may be linked to poorer perceptions of therapeutic approaches which are then not implemented. Furthermore, patient-centered treatment planning and concepts such as shared decision-making appear to be central in treating this population regarding secondary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39266686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.