Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

DAMM for the detection and tracking of multiple animals within complex social and environmental settings.

Gaurav Kaul, Jonathan McDevitt, Justin Johnson, Ada Eban-Rothschild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaurav KaulDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1043, USA. kaulg@umich.edu.
Jonathan McDevittDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1043, USA.
Justin JohnsonElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2121, USA.
Ada Eban-RothschildDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1043, USA. adae@umich.edu.

Funding

The neural mechanisms and mnemonic consequences of sound processing during sleepR01NS129874 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ada Eban-Rothschild, Gideon Rothschild · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
The functions of dopamine signaling during sleep in memoryR01NS131821 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ada Eban-Rothschild, Gideon Rothschild · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129874NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS131821NINDS NIH HHS R01NS131821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and tracking of animals across diverse environments are crucial for studying brain and behavior. Recently, computer vision techniques have become essential for high-throughput behavioral studies; however, localizing animals in complex conditions remains challenging due to intra-class visual variability and environmental diversity. These challenges hinder studies in naturalistic settings, such as when animals are partially concealed within nests. Moreover, current tools are laborious and time-consuming, requiring extensive, setup-specific annotation and training procedures. To address these challenges, we introduce the 'Detect-Any-Mouse-Model' (DAMM), an object detector for localizing mice in complex environments with minimal training. Our approach involved collecting and annotating a diverse dataset of single- and multi-housed mice in complex setups. We trained a Mask R-CNN, a popular object detector in animal studies, to perform instance segmentation and validated DAMM's performance on a collection of downstream datasets using zero-shot and few-shot inference. DAMM excels in zero-shot inference, detecting mice and even rats, in entirely unseen scenarios and further improves with minimal training. Using the SORT algorithm, we demonstrate robust tracking, competitive with keypoint-estimation-based methods. Notably, to advance and simplify behavioral studies, we release our code, model weights, and data, along with a user-friendly Python API and a Google Colab implementation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBehavior, AnimalAnimalsEnvironmentMiceRatsAnimal behaviorAnimal trackingComputer visionGeneralizationInstance segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39266610
PMCPMC11393305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.