Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266322›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Informal carer involvement in the transition of medicines-related care for patients moving from hospital to home: a realist review protocol.

Matthew Cooper, Olivia Atkinson, David Black, Laura Lindsey, Christina Cooper, Hamde Nazar, Geoff Wong, Carmel Hughes, Charlotte L Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew CooperNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Olivia AtkinsonSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-7553-6922
David BlackSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Laura LindseyNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Christina CooperSocial Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hamde NazarNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-5386
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Carmel HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-6021
Charlotte L RichardsonNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Charlotte.Richardson2@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2195-4279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTransition of care for a patient between hospital and home can cause disruption to normal routines, increasing the risk of medicines-related harm. The transition from hospital to home is more complex when a patient does not self-manage their medicines but relies on an informal or unpaid carer (eg, spouse, family member or friend) to provide support. Given the day-to-day medicines-related support provided by informal carers, there is a need to understand how informal carers manage the transition of care from hospital to home; what aspects of hospital discharge act as barriers and facilitators to their involvement and when, how and why these impact patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A realist review will be undertaken to develop a programme theory. The programme theory will theorise which medicines-related interventions are useful to carers, and how they are useful. It will outline what aspects of those interventions are the most useful and why, and how context influences engagement and medicine-related outcomes. The review will be reported in line with the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidelines. Data will be selected, screened and extracted based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and relevance to the developing programme theory with the involvement of at least two authors acting independently. Inclusion criteria relate to the relevance to hospital discharge where patients move back to their home, where a carer is involved and where interventions relate to medicines use. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost) and EMBASE databases (see supplementary materials for a draft search strategy).Patients and public, participation, involvement and engagement (PPIE) will be incorporated into all stages of the review through iterative engagement and discussion with patient, carers and representatives from carer organisations. The review will follow four steps: (1) development of the initial programme theory, (2) evidence search, (3) selection, extracting, and organising data and (4) synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions.Informal carer involvement in transitions of care is a complex and varied phenomena. The programme theory will be shaped by sustained PPIE reflecting the priorities and experiences of lived experience. The realist review be progressively focused so we can develop a better understanding of carer involvement in patient transitions when moving from hospital to home relating to medicines use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The findings of the review will be disseminated via journal articles and through patient and public facing resources such as a visual patient-public-carer focused summary. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021262827.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient DischargeHome Care ServicesHumansResearch DesignTransitional CareCaregiver BurdenCaregiversHospital to Home TransitionMedicine

Identifiers

PMID39266322
PMCPMC11409271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.