Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266303›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Investigation of Metaplasticity Associated with Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Humans.

Mandy Yi Rong Ding, Tarun Arora, Can Sarica, Andrew Z Yang, Negar Nasrkhani, Talyta Grippe, Jean-François Nankoo, Stephanie Tran, Nardin Samuel, Xue Xia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mandy Yi Rong DingInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Tarun AroraKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Can SaricaKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Andrew Z YangDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Negar NasrkhaniKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Talyta GrippeKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Jean-François NankooKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Stephanie TranInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Nardin SamuelDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Xue XiaKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-7880
Andres M LozanoKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada.
Robert ChenKrembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1M8, Canada robert.chen@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8371-8629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a novel technique for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS). TUS delivered in a theta (5 Hz) burst pattern (tbTUS) induces plasticity in the human primary motor cortex (M1) for 30-60 min, showing promise for therapeutic development. Metaplasticity refers to activity-dependent changes in neural functions governing synaptic plasticity; depotentiation is the reversal of long-term potentiation (LTP) by a subsequent protocol with no effect alone. Metaplasticity can enhance plasticity induction and clinical efficacy of NIBS protocols. In our study, we compared four NIBS protocol combinations to investigate metaplasticity on tbTUS in humans of either sex. We delivered four interventions: (1) sham continuous theta burst stimulation with 150 pulses (cTBS150) followed by real tbTUS (tbTUS only), (2) real cTBS150 followed by sham tbTUS (cTBS only), (3) real cTBS150 followed by real tbTUS (metaplasticity), and (4) real tbTUS followed by real cTBS150 (depotentiation). We measured motor-evoked potential amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-interval intracortical facilitation before and up to 90 min after plasticity intervention. Plasticity effects lasted at least 60 min longer when tbTUS was primed with cTBS150 compared with tbTUS alone. Plasticity was abolished when cTBS150 was delivered after tbTUS. cTBS150 alone had no significant effect. No changes in M1 intracortical circuits were observed. Plasticity induction by tbTUS can be modified in manners consistent with homeostatic metaplasticity and depotentiation. This substantiates evidence that tbTUS induces LTP-like processes and suggests that metaplasticity can be harnessed in the therapeutic development of TUS.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityAdultFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationUltrasonic WavesYoung Adultfocused ultrasoundmetaplasticitynoninvasive brain stimulantsynaptic plasticitytranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39266303
PMCPMC11529810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.