Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39265565›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neuroscience2025

Synaptic Pruning by Microglia: Lessons from Genetic Studies in Mice.

Sayan Nandi, Junia Lara de Deus, Oluwaseun Samuel Faborode, Sayan Nandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immune-mediated excitotoxicity in brain disorders.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Disrupted maternal care alters neural-microglia interactions in the primate paralaminar (PL) nucleus of the amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayan NandiDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Junia Lara de DeusDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Oluwaseun Samuel FaborodeDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Sayan NandiDepartment of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Microglia-Neuron Interactions: Roles for Microglial Iba1R21MH124294 · NIMH · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI CASTILLO, PABLO E, NANDI, SAYAN · 2021 to 2022
$443k
AIF1/Iba1 in microglial function and strokeR21NS116480 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NANDI, SAYAN, SIBINGA, NICHOLAS E · 2020 to 2020
$441k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH124294NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS116480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural circuits are subjected to refinement throughout life. The dynamic addition and elimination (pruning) of synapses are necessary for maturation of neural circuits and synaptic plasticity. Due to their phagocytic nature, microglia have been considered as the primary mediators of synaptic pruning. Synaptic pruning can strengthen an active synapse by removing excess weaker synapses during development. Inappropriate synaptic pruning can often influence a disease outcome or an injury response. SUMMARY: This review offers a focused discussion on microglial roles in synaptic pruning, based on the evidence gathered from genetic manipulations in mice. Genetically labeled microglia and synapses often allow assessment of their interactions in real time. Further manipulations involving synaptically localized molecules, neuronally or glial-derived diffusible factors, and their respective cognate receptors in microglia provide critical evidence in support of a direct role of microglia in synaptic pruning. KEY MESSAGE: We discuss microglial contact-dependent "eat-me," "don't-eat-me," and "find-me" signals, as well as recently identified noncontact pruning, under the contexts of neural circuit, brain region, developmental window, and an injury or a disease state.

Indexed as

BrainMicrogliaNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesAnimalsMiceBehaviorExcitatory and inhibitory synapsesMicrogliaPhagocytosisSynapse engulfment

Identifiers

PMID39265565
PMCPMC12500284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.