Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39265466›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2024

Results of a randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin for newly diagnosed and recurrent Chemonaive stromal ovarian tumors: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study14.

Jubilee Brown, Austin Miller, Laura L Holman, Floor Backes, Christa Nagel, David Bender, David S Miller, Matthew A Powell, Shannon N Westin, Albert Bonebrake and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01042522 (A Randomized Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin vs. Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage and Recurrent Chemonaive Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors of the Ovary), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01042522 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin vs. Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage and Recurrent Chemonaive Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors of the Ovary

TypeinterventionalSponsorGOG FoundationRan2010 to 2022Enrolled63ConditionsOvarian Granulosa Cell Tumor, Ovarian Gynandroblastoma, Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor, Ovarian Sex Cord Tumor With Annular TubulesArmsBleomycin Sulfate, Carboplatin, Cisplatin, Etoposide Phosphate, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jubilee BrownAtrium Health Levine Cancer, Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlotte, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: Jubilee.Brown@Atriumhealth.org.
Austin MillerNRG Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: Austin.Miller@RoswellPark.org.
Laura L HolmanUniversity of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America. Electronic address: Laura-L-Holman@ouhsc.edu.
Floor BackesThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: Floor.Backes@OSUMC.edu.
Christa NagelCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: Christa.Nagel@OSUMC.edu.
David BenderUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America. Electronic address: David-Bender@UIowa.edu.
David S MillerUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: David.Miller@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Matthew A PowellWashington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: mpowell@wustl.edu.
Shannon N WestinThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: swestin@mdanderson.org.
Albert BonebrakeCancer Research for the Ozarks, Springfield, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: albert.bonebrake@coxhealth.com.
Carolyn Y MullerUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America. Electronic address: CMuller@salud.unm.edu.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDuke University, Durham, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: secor002@MC.Duke.edu.
Erin CraneAtrium Health Levine Cancer, Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlotte, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: Erin.crane@atriumhealth.org.
John SchorgeUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center -, Memphis, TN, United States of America. Electronic address: jschorge@uthsc.edu.
William P TewMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: TewW@mskcc.org.
Anil K SoodThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: asood@mdanderson.org.
Michael A BookmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kaiser-Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: Michael.A.Bookman@kp.org.
Carol AghajanianMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: aghajanc@MSKCC.org.
David M GershensonThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: DGershen@mdanderson.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) compared to bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for treatment of newly diagnosed Stage IIA-IV or recurrent chemotherapy-naive ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST).

methodsThis phase II noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients to receive PC (6 cycles P 175 mg/m2 and C AUC = 6 IV every 3 weeks), or BEP (4 cycles B 20 units/m2 IV push day 1, E 75 mg/m2 IV days 1-5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV days 1-5 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01042522.

resultsAt the interim analysis, 63 patients (31 PC and 32 B.P. had accrued between Feb 8, 2010 and Apr 30, 2020. Median age was 48 years. 87% had granulosa cell tumors. 37% had measurable disease. The DSMB closed accrual early for futility of PC arm. The futility analysis was supported by an estimated HR = 1.11 [95% CI: 0.57 to 2.13] which exceeded the pre-determined threshold for non-inferiority (1.10). Median PFS was 27.7 months [11.2 to 41.0] for PC and 19.7 months for BEP [95% CI: 10.4-52.7]. PC patients had fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events (PC 77% vs BEP 90%).

conclusionsThe study met its pre-specified criterion for stopping early for futility and so failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of PC versus BEP in ovarian SCSTs, in a non-inferiority test with a hazard ratio margin of 1.1. Both PC and BEP may be considered in patients with advanced/recurrent SCST.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBleomycinCarboplatinCisplatinEtoposideNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalSex Cord-Gonadal Stromal TumorsYoung AdultBleomycinCarboplatinCisplatinEtoposidePaclitaxelBleomycinGranulosa cell tumorOvarian cancerPaclitaxelSex cord-stromal tumor

Identifiers

PMID39265466
PMCPMC12204228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.