ArticleBlood advances2024
Outcomes with single-agent gilteritinib for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutant AML after contemporary induction therapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term follow-up of predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in the phase 3 COMMODORE trial.Annals of hematology · 2026Trial
- Gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a regional analysis of COMMODORE in China, South-East Asia, and Russia.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Timing of response in patients with relapsed/refractoryBlood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Disease course ofHaematologica · 2026Article
- Treatment sequence with gilteritinib and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia patients: A multicentre real-world study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the treatment of FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.Blood research · 2026Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of Gilteritinib Beyond Second-Line Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory FLT3 -Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-World Multicenter Study of 171 Patients.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Targeted triplet therapies incorporating FLT3 or IDH inhibitors: ready for prime time?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Article
- Targeting myeloid cells for hematological malignancies: the present and future.Biomarker research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractGilteritinib is the current standard of care for relapsed or refractory fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in many countries, however outcomes for patients relapsing after contemporary first-line therapies (intensive chemotherapy with midostaurin, or nonintensive chemotherapy with venetoclax) are uncertain. Moreover, reported data on toxicity and health care resource use is limited. Here, we describe a large real-world cohort of 152 patients receiving single-agent gilteritinib in 38 UK hospitals. Median age was 61 years, and 36% had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy, including a FLT3 inhibitor in 41% and venetoclax in 24%. A median of 4 cycles of gilteritinib were administered, with 56% of patients requiring hospitalization in the first cycle (median, 10 days). Over half of patients required transfusion in each of the first 4 cycles. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 21%, and CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) in a further 9%. Remission rates were lower for patients with FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain or adverse karyotype. Day-30 and day-60 mortality were 1% and 10.6%, respectively, and median overall survival was 9.5 months. On multivariable analysis, increasing age, KMT2A rearrangement, and complex karyotype were associated with worse survival whereas RUNX1 mutations were associated with improved survival. Twenty patients received gilteritinib as first salvage having progressed after first-line therapy with venetoclax, with CR/CRi achieved in 25% and median survival 4.5 months. Real-world results with gilteritinib mirror those seen in the clinical trials, but outcomes remain suboptimal, with more effective strategies needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.